Read about Wavelength.
ID Courses from Wavelength
ActionScript Certificate Courses.
Wavelength Workshops.
Training Participants' views
Read this month's editorial.
View Previous Issues of Wavelength.
Readers' Views.
Subscribe to Wavelength Newsletter.
Read the Wavelength articles.
Serials.
ID Section.
Technology Section.
Utilities to increase your efficiency.
Discussion Forum.
Laugh-a-Little.
Innoken Online Games.
Work at Wavelength.
Contact Wavelength.



 

 


Blended Learning: The Right Cocktail for Corporate Training

Tell me, and I'll forget. Show me, and I may remember. Involve me, and I'll understand"

-- Chinese Proverb --

A simple quote which tells us everything we need to know about corporate training. As technological innovations have led us to explore newer ways to eliminate the human element in training, the performance of pure e-learning solutions in training has not been encouraging. Yet due to the cost efficiencies, e-learning cannot be wished away. What’s the solution then?
According to a SIMBA Information research (a leading authority for market intelligence and forecasts in the media industry) the size of corporate training (sold by US firms) is $ 13.15 billion in 2006 out of which 8.12 % is of LMS related infrastructure solutions and live e-learning. Here I would like to emphasise the word ‘live e-learning’. Before I expand further on this, let us review another question, which is important in the context of corporate training.
Today e-learning service providers offer seamless management of audio-visual media and efficient delivery of training courses through elaborate feature rich learning management systems (LMSs). They even provide rapid content development tools for just-in time learning. But are these technological innovations able to help in training delivery with business impact?

Keeping audience engaged and motivated for the entire duration of the training program is a big challenge. Technology has still not conquered the basic attitude of humans neither it is expected to do so in near future. Unless e-learning solutions can cross this big challenge they cannot become a universal solution for training delivery.

Traditional classroom training has always been favored for the human interface of training which takes care of audience motivation but this is mostly conceived as a stopgap arrangement. Training to show business impact needs time and sustained efforts both on the part of the organization & the learners. Also the shortened business cycles & competition has changed the training focus on measurable results with business impact rather than knowledge. This trend has created a need for a longer engagement with learners.

In such a scenario what is the best approach? A rational logical analysis will help us arrive at a solution which takes the best of class room and combine it with the best of e-learning to achieve what is known as ‘Blended Learning’, which could overcome the challenges, we identified earlier. This approach has been termed as ‘live e-learning’ by SIMBA Information research.

Following are the two good definitions of Blended Learning:

“Blended Learning integrates seemingly opposite approaches, such as formal and informal learning, face-to-face and online experiences, directed paths and reliance on self direction, and digital references and collegial connections, in order to achieve individual and organizational goals.”
- American Management Association

An integrated strategy for delivering on promises about learning and performance. They further elaborate that blending as a strategy involves “a planned combination of approaches, such as coaching by a supervisor; participation in an online class; competency descriptions; reference to a manual; participation in seminars, workshops, and online communities.”
-Rossett, Douglis, Frazee

Synthesizing the essence of both these definitions, we can infer that: Blended learning can be thought of as a ‘choicest cocktail’ of learning solutions to meet the training objectives by combining the best of class room training and e-learning platform to deliver training objectives. There is evidence to prove that Blended learning is more effective than pure e-learning solutions...Thomson Netg have released a 2003 white paper that reported speedier performance on real world tasks by people who learned through a blended strategy—than those studying through e-learning alone.

However when we say that blended learning works well, we need to be careful how the total training engagement has been designed. In my experience the critical skill building or attitudinal modules are better dealt with an instructor led format. However assessments, coaching & mentoring sessions can be effectively covered on a web-based module. The judicious mix of learning solution however would depend on the profile of the learning audience, degree of engagement with the audience, the organizational mandate for training i.e. on-the-job or off-the-job and also the cost implications.

The content design in a blended learning has to be flexible enough to accommodate the various delivery mechanisms. Let me elaborate upon this point. Instructor led training sessions always lay emphasis on the ‘flow of content’ from simple to complex with the facilitator emphasizing on the learning points being extracted from the learning audience through interactive techniques. If the chunking of the content is not correct and not in line with the blended modules, the audience will not respond effectively. All this has to be in sync with the basic instructional design principles.

Another reason that the blended learning approach works well in training is the collaborative learning which happens in the class room. It is true that peers act as a strong motivation factor in learning. This has been well documented by Barbara Gross Davis in her book ‘Tools for Teaching’. I must also emphasize the fact that blended learning needs to be seen as a strategic initiative and therefore two important factors need to be considered:

  • The performance deliverables need to be spelt out and incorporated in the curriculum design.
  • A strong buy-in for implementing the solution by the organization is necessary

At the end I need to reiterate that despite overwhelming evidence of inherent advantages of the blended learning approach, it would be short-sighted to position it as a panacea for all corporate training needs unless it has the right ‘cocktail’ to understand the business problems, processes and technologies to make it work.

Author:
Manish Chandra,
Group Manager

Bharti Comptel Ltd.
                                                                    email: manish.chandra@sify.com

 

Home  |  Subscribe  |  Gift Subscription  |  Send your Views  |  Unsubscribe  |  Sitemap

Copyright © 2007 Wavelength eLearning Consulting and Training Pvt. Ltd.
Wavelength eLearning Consulting & Training , Link House, 2nd Floor, C-4, Sector 10, Noida - 201301, India.
( Noida is part of Delhi NCR, India )

The site requires Internet Explorer 5.5 / Netscape 6 or higher and best viewed on a resolution of 1024 X 768 with true color..

All rights reserved. No part of this site or its content my be reproduced in any manner or communicated, except in case of brief quotations, without the explicit permission of the publisher. All the brand names / product names / service-marks mentioned on this site are the copyrights of their respective owners.